http://www.flickr.com/photos/jezpage/5057940107/ |
Not only does The Right Number allow the reader to progress the action through clicking, it actually gives up control of the sequence to the reader by offering individual panel number options at the bottom. Much like the protagonist of the story experimented with numbers to try and find his perfect woman, the reader is able to experiment with panel numbers to create the perfect story.
The Korean comic does the exact opposite. Most readers will follow the story at their own pace, comfortably scrolling along the page. At first the zombie character doesn't seem so terrifying. You can tell by the cliche setting that the creepy figure in the distance is, in fact, going to be creepy as anticipated. But then you lose control of the pace of the panels, and the creature turns unexpectedly quickly. The result is an instant shock to the system, a surprise that pulls the reader in to what might not have been such an enticing story otherwise.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/slipstreamblue/2638690797/ |
Are these two stories following the rules for what a comic should be? According to Le Holy Grail de Wikipedia, and our course textbook, it is the deliberately sequential nature of the pictures that defines the medium. If that's the case, then The Right Number forfeits its credibility as a comic, as the reader can easily destroy the intended sequence of panels. What most people agree is that comics and animation are NOT the same, but does that mean the quick moving panels of the Korean comic also disqualify it from being a comic?
For me, comics are an interactive medium, much like a film that has been slowed down and over-edited in order for the reader to jump in and actively participate in the telling of the story. But then, what differentiates a graphic novel from any other novel that gives the reader some sense of inclusiveness?
I hope by the end of the semester, I'll be able to define comics more clearly. Otherwise, anything visual could be a comic... or not.
I totally agree with the action of the person helping McClouds story! I think it adds a level of excitement to the rather dull story and with this activeness makes it seem more interesting! I still think that the Korean novel is a comic, however... we shall see!
ReplyDeleteI like how you described the two comics, that they are both complete opposites. When I read the comics, I could see everything that you described here but I never thought to compare them the way you did. The readers of the Korean comic definitely feel that they have control over their reading pace of the comic but suddenly lose control when the animation kicks in, or, what appears to be animation. I noticed that if you went back up the page after the "animation occured", you could still see all of the frames which, when combined, made an allusion of animation instead of having a comic book feel. Maybe they just wanted to give the illusion of a person sitting in the wind trying to read this novel, apparently that's when it would be scary!
ReplyDeleteIt's traditional for asian horror for the monster to have a constant presence. Not like American horror where the monster will disappear and suddenly reappear. Quick sudden motions are also indicative of asian horror but might lose their impact on paper.
ReplyDeleteYou could say that the animation was probably done to specifically identify the genre, not define the medium. The rest of the comic was done in a webcomic format, with the animations only there to enhance the horror.